Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
Cordon by the police of the 24 Oktoberplein, Utrecht, after the tram attack on March 18, 2019
Cordon by the police of the 24 Oktoberplein, Utrecht, after the tram attack on March 18, 2019 - Credit: Hansmuller / Wikimedia Commons - License: CC-BY-SA
Crime
Utrecht
Rinke Terpstra
Axel Beijersbergen van Henegouwen
court case
Gökmen T.
24 Oktoberplein
terrorist attack
Qbuzz
province of Utrecht
Volkskrant
commemoration
Sharon Dijksma
Dilan Yesilgoz
Saturday, 18 March 2023 - 18:40
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

Family of Utrecht tram attack victim blames bus company, provincial officials

Relatives hold the carrier and the province responsible for the Utrecht tram attack

Relatives of Rinke Terpstra, who died during the terrorist attack on a tram in Utrecht, are holding the public transport company Qbuzz and the province of Utrecht jointly responsible for his death. Axel Beijersbergen van Henegouwen, the lawyer representing the relatives, confirmed this after a report by the Volkskrant.

During the attack on March 18, 2019, Gökmen T. shot inside a tram and around the vehicle on the 24 Oktoberplein, killing four people and injuring many others. Due to the tram driver's decision to keep the doors closed during the attack, the passengers inside the tram were unable to flee when Gökmen T. opened fire.

Beijersbergen van Henergouwen believes that Terpstra's death could have been prevented. By keeping the doors closed, the death of Rinke Terpstra is “the result of a circumstance that the carrier could have avoided, or the consequences of which the company could have prevented,” the lawyer said.

According to the lawyer, there are multiple factors contributing to the province and transportation company being held jointly accountable for the attack four years after it occurred. "This has, among other things, to do with the fact that we first tried to reach an agreement with Qbuzz, but they redirected responsibility to the province. The province is the lessor of the trams. Beijersbergen van Henegouwen pointed out that the statute of limitations for this case has not yet expired.

The Volkskrant did not receive a comment on the specifics of the case from Qbuzz, but the company's lawyer dismissed the Terpstra family's allegations as a "one-sided presentation of the facts.” The province of Utrecht also declined to provide a comment to the newspaper, saying that the case is still in court.

The attack was commemorated on Saturday. Relatives, aid workers, witnesses, Utrecht Mayor Sharon Dijksma, members of the city council, and Justice Minister Dilan Yesilgöz attended the ceremony.

Reporting by ANP

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Keukenhof welcome’s the season’s first guests today; Open for 8 weeks
  • Dutch central bank reports first loss since 1931 amid rising interest rates
  • Landlords selling private sector rentals as new rules slash their income
  • Asylum seeker accused of killing therapist tied to two other murders: report
  • 14 Dutch teens rescued from ship that ran aground in Norway
  • Virus outbreak at Dutch national team's training camp; Five footballers sent home

Top stories

  • Dutch central bank reports first loss since 1931 amid rising interest rates
  • Casinos spent much more on gambling ads despite promises not to
  • More people ask euthanasia center for help; 1,240 requests approved last year
  • Housing Min. considering rent reduction for tenants in poorly insulated homes
  • Amsterdam alderman wants to introduce 20km/h biking speed limit
  • Dutch authorities preparing for outbreak of candida auris, a fungus that can be lethal

© 2012-2023, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content