Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
Crime
Politics
Amsterdam
Bulgaria
Council of State
court
Eberhard van der Laan
ECJ
European court of justice
human trafficking
Hungary
J. Harmsen
Noord Holland
pimping
prostitution
Red Light District
sex
sex trafficking
Friday, 2 October 2015 - 13:28
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

Court: Amsterdam brothel owners must speak prostitutes’ language

With reporting by Graeme Kidd. Entrepreneurs in Amsterdam who want to open a brothel must speak at least one common language with the sex workers they rent space to, according to a Thursday ruling handed down by the European Court of Justice. The court made the decision as it is a way to guarantee the safety of the women, reduction of human trafficking, and to help prevent pimping. The case involved J. Harmsen, a brothel owner who wanted to operate two more Red Light District window prostitution businesses, a move that was blocked by the office of the Amsterdam mayor, Eberhard van der Laan, on July 28, 2011, according to the court’s ruling. Contrary to the business plan he submitted, “Mr Harmsen rented rooms out in shifts to prostitutes of Hungarian and Bulgarian origin who, during the immigration admission procedure, could not communicate in a language which Mr Harmsen could understand,” the court wrote. The mayor refused because he found Harmsen and his plan unreliable. An Amsterdam court dismissed a complaint against the city a year later, which was upheld by the Council of State, which noted that the decision is to “prevent criminal offenses such as forced prostitution and human trafficking,” and was further not discriminatory in any way.. Harness argued that rules requiring him to determine a “prostitute’s background and motivations” in private conversation was too much of a burden. He alternately suggested that by being on site and operating video surveillance, he was able to pick up on the signs of criminal activity and notify police. In siding with the city, the court also noted the Council of State’s notion that the seeming overreach in authority was meant as a protection of public order, and that being able to converse with a sex worker allows a brothel owner the possibility of stopping child prostitution. The ECJ ruled that it was the job of a national court to decide if the public’s interest is served in restricting the offer of a service. It ruled that there is no undue burden as there is no requirement of a specific language to be used between a sex worker and brothel owner, nor of a specific fluency level, but “merely that the parties can understand each other,” the ECJ said. The ECJ said it did not see a less restrictive alternative.

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Drought uncovering 10,000-year-old tree stumps in Friesland lake
  • Video: American truck dealership torched in Brabant; Extinction Rebellion denounces act
  • Three Dutch universities in top 100 world ranking; Leiden drops to top 150
  • MH17 court ruling set for 17 Nov. as Russia reportedly detains MH17 defendant
  • Another passenger arrested for sharing pic of crashed plane, this time at Schiphol
  • Orientation periods start at many Dutch universities

Top stories

  • Young homeless people often can't find room in shelters
  • Netherlands lagging behind in purchase of coronavirus pill
  • Asylum seekers clash in Ter Apel; "A nasty situation," State Secretary says
  • Officially warmest August 14 since measurements began
  • NS on track for record year of delays, malfunctions; Plans underway for faster Airport Sprinter
  • Dutch publisher to reprint Rushdie's 'Satanic Verses'

© 2012-2022, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content