Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
Foreground: Twee Lachende Jongens by Frans Hals. Background: De Lentetuin by Vincent van Gogh
Foreground: Twee Lachende Jongens by Frans Hals. Background: De Lentetuin by Vincent van Gogh - Credit: Politie / Politie
Crime
Art
Singer Laren
Hofje van Mevrouw van Aerden
Naarden
Leerdam
art theft
Nils M.
Vincent van Gogh
Frans Hals
court
public prosecutor
Friday, September 10, 2021 - 14:20
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

Suspect denies involvement in theft of Van Gogh, Hals paintings

Nils M., suspected of breaking into two museums and the theft of paintings by Frans Hals and Vincent van Gogh, said he has "nothing at all" to do with either art theft. The 59-year-old man from Baarn stated this on Friday at the start of the criminal case against him before the court in Lelystad. The Public Prosecutor demanded eight years in prison against M, the highest possible sentence for this type of crime. 

According to the judiciary, M. broke into the Singer Laren Museum in Naarden at the end of March 2020 and stole the painting 'Spring garden, the rectory garden in Nuenen in the spring' by Vincent van Gogh. At the end of August, he also allegedly removed the canvas 'Two laughing boys' by Frans Hals from the Hofje van Mevrouw van Aerden in Leerdam. Both works are worth millions of euros. The Van Gogh was insured for 2.5 million euros, the Hals for over 8.7 million euros. 

The prosecutor spoke of "the worst type of business burglary there is". According to her, the theft affects "the entire art world and the public". And the "invaluable" cultural heritage is still missing. The prosecutor said there was a good chance that the paintings ended up in the underworld. According to her, it is "realistic" to assume they will never be found.

"I don't know anything about it. I've never been to those museums," said M., who is also on trial for firearms and hard drugs possession, and who consistently invoked his right to remain silent with the police. "I haven't been there, not at all. I've been accused of something I had nothing to do with. I don't know who could have done it. I'm not an art lover at all. I like old things."

M.'s DNA was found at the museums after the art theft. At Van Gogh's work it was on a list which was found smashed to pieces outside the museum. In the second burglary, it was found on a strap that had been thrown over a wall from a flagpole outside the museum. The break-ins were allegedly committed by two people.

M.'s lawyer asked for acquittal. According to her, it cannot be established unequivocally that the DNA material originated from her client. She also emphasized that no further trace evidence pointed to her client. M. himself called the sentence demand "ridiculous".

The court will rule on September 24. 

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • French boy arrested in Amersfoort after stolen car chase
  • Police investigating hundreds of suspicious transactions at holiday parks
  • Dutch defender Botman headed to Newcastle in €37M deal; Chelsea offer for De Ligt rejected
  • 75th anniversary of Anne Frank diary commemorated in Amsterdam
  • U.S. abortion ruling a "disaster," say Dutch activists
  • Amsterdam mayor calls coffeeshop ban for tourists 'inevitable'

Top stories

  • Regional bus drivers strike in Groningen, Almere, Waalwijk
  • Extra Covid-19 measures not yet necessary: Van Dissel
  • Farmers demonstrate in many places, dump straw bale at minister's house
  • Consumer spending pushed Dutch economic growth in first quarter
  • Hope of EU membership big support for Ukraine, Dutch PM says
  • Transavia summer flight cancellations breaking EU rules: Consumers Assoc.

© 2012-2022, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content