Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
greenhouse gas emissions Frank J. (Frank John) Aleksandrowicz Wikimedia commons
Nature
greenhouse gas emissions
court
ruling
Urgenda
Dutch State
duty of care
Climate change
Tuesday, October 9, 2018 - 12:30
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

Dutch state must do more to reduce emissions, court rules

The Dutch State must do more to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the court in The Hague ruled after dismissing each of the state attorney's arguments one after the other. The Hague court therefore maintains a previous ruling three years ago that was a groundbreaking victory for environmental organization Urgenda. The State appealed against that ruling, NOS reports.

Urgenda demands that the Dutch State take measures to ensure that the emission of greenhouse gasses in 2020 is reduced by 25 percent compared to 1990. The court in The Hague concluded that 25 percent is the bare minimum for the State to comply with its duty of care. There is a "real threat" due to climate change, the court emphasized.

The state attorney argued that the Netherlands is only a small country and that climate change is a global problem. The court acknowledged this, but added that this "does not relieve the Netherlands of the obligation to make efforts from its territory to provide protection against climate change". 

The fact that the Netherlands set itself the goal of reducing emissions by 49 percent by 2030, also did not mean much to the court. It's necessary to intervene now, to limit risks and extra costs, the court ruled. Last year emissions were 13 percent lower than in 1990. According to the court, the Netherlands is on track to reduce emissions by 23 percent. But there is an important uncertainty margin of 19 to 27 percent. For this reason, there is a real chance that the reduction will be lower and that is "not acceptable", the court said.

The Dutch State has a duty of care and must take measures to protect civilians "against industrial activities", the court repeatedly emphasized. "In case of danger, the state must take preventative measures." If the State doesn't intervene, there is a risk that "the current generation will be faced with loss of life or disruption of family life". 

The state attorney also argued that the separation of powers prescribes that the court can not interfere in political decisions. But the court also dismissed that argument because the Netherlands has bound itself to international treaties, which are legally binding and thus legally verifiable by the Dutch court.

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • De Weldoener Blond named 2022's best Dutch beer
  • Dutch man gets life in Belgium for four murders
  • Scheveningen fireworks show canceled over police shortage
  • Completed life euthanasia proposal needs more safeguards against misuse: Council of State
  • Dutch deficit rises to 3.4%, leading to some higher taxes; 30 percent expat benefit reduced
  • First monkeypox case definitively found in Netherlands

Top stories

  • Dutch deficit rises to 3.4%, leading to some higher taxes; 30 percent expat benefit reduced
  • First monkeypox case definitively found in Netherlands
  • Staff shortages putting more holiday flights at risk
  • Dutch journalist accused of espionage in Benin
  • PM Rutte survives debate on deleted texts
  • Storm warning intensified: Code orange alert issued for three Dutch provinces

© 2012-2022, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content