Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
2006-12-14TeddysCandle
Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Wildfeuer) - Credit: Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Wildfeuer)
Crime
Arnhem
Arnhem Court
forgery
court clerk
public prosecutor
baby
neglect
severe child abuse
Janneke Steenbrink
Sander van 't Hullenaar
Tuesday, 21 February 2017 - 08:41
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

Forged doc could result in baby's convicted killer going free: lawyers

Possible forgery by a clerk at the court in Arnhem could result in a 26-year-old man from Arnhem, convicted of killing his infant son, going free, according to the lawyers representing him, AD reports.

The 26-year-old man was sentenced to 46 months in prison in October last year for the severe abuse and neglect of his son, resulting in the baby's death in 2010. The baby had several broken bones and eventually died from the effects of an intestinal perforation. According to the doctors who examined the baby's body, that was caused by a hard punch in the stomach.

Lawyers Sander van 't Hullenaar and Janneke Steenbrink filed an appeal. According to them there is a good chance that the Public Prosecutor will be declared "inadmissible" because of forgery by a court clerk. The lawyers believe the clerk antedated a pleading document used by the Prosecutor to file for appeal in this case in 2013.

"The original appeal document lacked the necessary signatures of both the clerk and the prosecutor. Subsequently the clerk backdated the deed eight days after the expiration of the appeal time by falsely recording in the deed that the appeal was brought on 26 June 2013 while it was in fact already 18 July 2013", Van 't Hullenaar said to the newspaper. "An absolute mortal sin, a very serious violation of due process."

A spokesperson for the Gelderland court confirmed to that "something administrative went amiss" around the appeal deed. The Rijksrecherche investigated the matter in 2015. "It was a stupid mistake made by one of our employees, but there is no question of intent", the spokesperson said. The clerk was moved to another department, where he worked for a while, but is now back at the court in Arnhem. The prosecutor in Amsterdam ultimately decided not to launch a criminal case against him, concluding that the court's disciplinary action against the clerk was sufficient. No evidence was found that the Prosecutor on the case was also guilty of forgery. However, he did "blindly" sign the document.

The two lawyers filed an appeal against the conviction of their client. As the clerk in question is still working at the Arnhem court, they want the case to be handled by the court in Amsterdam, to avoid any bias. Van 'T Hullenaar calls it a "matter of social interest" that the tampering wit dates on process documents come into the open.

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Explosions at 3 Amsterdam-Noord homes in less than an hour
  • Truck smashes into motor home in Germany, killing Dutch driver
  • Cocaine trafficking case against footballer Quincy Promes outlined in first hearing
  • Long-term mortgage interest rates will fall this year, analysts say
  • Twenty homes uninhabitable for three years after Amsterdam apartment building fire
  • Air France-KLM looking to replace more old planes with fuel-efficient models

Top stories

  • Trains expected to run from 9 a.m. around Amsterdam, Utrecht & The Hague
  • Most Dutch businesses facing higher costs they can’t pass on despite rising debt levels
  • Woman possibly abducted in Houten; Police looking for witnesses
  • Amsterdam train traffic still halted as outage continues; Cause still unknown
  • All train traffic halted to and from Amsterdam Central Station due to malfunction
  • Amsterdam apartment building uninhabitable after major fire

© 2012-2023, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content