PFAS cleanup costs in the Netherlands reach €70 million as efforts continue
Efforts to clean up PFAS contamination in the Netherlands have already cost nearly 70 million euros, with remediation underway at 52 locations nationwide. The figure, based on data collected by Platform Investico in collaboration with Het Financieele Dagblad and De Groene Amsterdammer, is expected to rise as costs for 24 of these projects remain undisclosed.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are synthetic chemicals used in various products for their water- and grease-resistant properties. These "forever chemicals" are known for their persistence in the environment and toxicity even in minuscule amounts. Research has linked PFAS exposure to cancer and other health risks.
The cleanup is proving both extensive and expensive. In Enschede, 11 million euros is being spent to remove PFAS from the soil beneath a playground that was formerly the site of a textile factory. In Doetinchem, the national government is covering 8 million euros to address contamination from PFAS-containing firefighting foam. The cleanup of an old airbase in Soesterberg has reached 22 million euros.
The principle of "the polluter pays" often does not apply in these cases, as some responsible companies are no longer operational. The Dutch government is covering the majority of costs. Martijn van Houten, director of the foundation Bodembeheer Nederland, stated, “These costs are just the tip of the iceberg.” His organization has seen a rise in inquiries related to PFAS contamination, which has been detected not only near manufacturers like Chemours in Dordrecht but also at industrial and defense sites across the country.
Cleaning PFAS-contaminated soil is significantly more expensive than dealing with other toxins. According to Investico’s analysis, removing PFAS can cost up to 1,000 times more than removing substances like mercury or lead. Experts noted that municipalities sometimes spend hundreds of thousands of euros to extract just a few grams of PFAS. “In such cases, the benefits do not outweigh the costs,” said Arne Alphenaar, a soil specialist at TTE Consultants. “It’s socially, economically, and environmentally unfeasible to clean all of the Netherlands.”
The Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management does not have a comprehensive list of PFAS-contaminated sites or companies releasing PFAS into the environment. Minister Madlener recently informed the Tweede Kamer that it would take until 2032 to complete such an inventory. By contrast, Belgium already tracks all PFAS emitters nationwide.
In Europe, cleaning PFAS from drinking water and soil could cost 95 billion euros over the next two decades, even if production and emissions stopped immediately, according to a study led by Le Monde in partnership with international researchers. Continuing production will multiply the costs by a factor of 20. Ali Ling, a researcher at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota, who contributed to the study, warned, “There isn’t enough money in the world to remove all PFAS from the environment.”
