Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
LinkedIn
LinkedIn - Credit: ibphoto / DepositPhotos - License: DepositPhotos
Politics
Wybren van Haga
LinkedIn
Coronavirus
court
misinformation
Wednesday, 6 October 2021 - 14:00
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

LinkedIn ordered to restore Dutch MP’s profile, but coronavirus posts can be deleted

Parliamentarian Wybren van Haga can get his LinkedIn profile back. The court in Haarlem ruled that the network must admit him again within three working days. Van Haga asked for this in summary proceedings filed after LinkedIn removed his profile for spreading misinformation about the coronavirus.

The court decided that LinkedIn does not have to put back the nine deleted posts, and rectification must stay on the profile. Van Haga also demanded that.

LinkedIn's lawyers argued during the trial that Van Haga's posts included both opinions and medical claims without scientific substantiation. Van Haga's account was previously temporarily suspended. Last year, LinkedIn temporarily blocked the account of pollster Maurice de Hond. The platform said on Wednesday that it was "disappointed" with the ruling and is considering appealing.

"It's great that the judge decided to scrap the disproportionate measure and ordered LinkedIn to put my profile back,' Van Haga responded to the ruling on Wednesday. "A victory for free speech, a victory for democracy where representatives of the people should be able to say what they think."

The judge ruled that platforms like LinkedIn "may in principle act against the spread of misinformation." It is "not unreasonable" that LinkedIn uses authoritative bodies like the RIVM and the World Health Organization (WHO) as a guideline. But the court also established that LinkedIn has hardly written about its policy in this area and thus does not sufficiently inform the network's user. LinkedIn only mandates that a user not post content that wholly violates guidelines set by leading health organizations and government agencies. The judge found the boundary between such content and posts with critical comments on those guidelines unclear.

LinkedIn did not communicate well enough about the objections to Van Haga's posts, the judge ruled. It merely referred to the user agreement and did not explain why the posts were considered disinformation.

The judge ruled in favor of Linked in on the nine deleted posts which made claims amounting to "harmful misinformation."

Reporting by ANP

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • AZ-Utrecht ends in an incredible 5-5 scoreline; PSV back to winning ways
  • One person found dead after major fire in business premises in Schellinkhout
  • Ajax pick up their first win since October in Heitinga’s debut
  • Philips restructuring: Massive layoffs and recall of sleep apnea devices
  • Police officer injured after being dragged more than 300 meters by car
  • Extinction Rebellion protest: 768 arrests made and 725 activists released

Top stories

  • Dutch royal family under fire for “caricature insensitivity”
  • Prime Minister Mark Rutte will speak at Holocaust commemoration
  • A12 open again after Extinction Rebellion protest, more than 500 people arrested
  • Police intervenes Extinction Rebellion protest on A12; Dozens of people arrested
  • Rutte lashes out at left wing parties in election campaign interview
  • Netherlands and the US agree on export restriction of ASML chip machines

© 2012-2023, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content