Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
150317154525-verstappen-profile-super-169
Business
Crime
Max Verstappen
Picnic
court
lookalike
personality rights
right of publicity
Lex de Jager
Wednesday, 6 September 2017 - 17:00
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

F1 driver's personality rights violated in grocery chain's lookalike ad campaign: court

F1 driver Max Verstappen won a court case he filed against Picnic because the online grocery store used a lookalike of him in one of its ad campaigns. The court ruled on Wednesday that Picnic violated Verstappen's personality rights by using the lookalike. The amount in compensation Picnic will have to pay to Verstappen is yet to be determined, NU.nl reports.

Personality right, or the right of publicity, is an individual's right to control the commercial use of his or her name, image, likeness, or other unequivocal aspects of one's identity, according to Wikipedia.

This case revolved around a video Picnic posted on Facebook in September 2016, and then almost immediately removed again. The video was a variation of a Jumbo ad in which the real Max Verstappen deliverers groceries. Jumbo is one of Verstappen's sponsors. The Picnic video featured a Verstappen lookalike.

In a previous hearing, Picnic said that the video was meant as a joke and that the production cost no more than 200 euros. According to the online supermarket, they did not consider it necessary to get Verstappen's permission, because the video was a parody.

Verstappen's lawyer, Lex de Jager, argued that the video was not a joke, but a well thought out media strategy. Using another's identity in advertising is unlawful, he said.

The judge ruled in Verstappen's favor. "Even though it's just a lookalike, the actor has all the characteristic features of Verstappen. The same cap, the same race outfit, the same hair color, the same silhouette and the same posture", the judge said on Wednesday. According to the court, Verstappen's right to oppose the use of his personality outweighs Picnic's right to free expression in this case. "Verstappen must be able to decide for himself if he wants to use his popularity in business activity."

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • RKC-Ajax suspended after severe injury for Etienne Vaessen
  • PSV keep winning with 3-1 victory over Volendam
  • Erasmus MC honors teacher killed in shooting: "it won't be the same without him"
  • Minor arrested after shooting incident in Coevorden; explosion at Alkmaar home
  • Cabinet sees plans for minimum wage increase and low fuel taxes on shaky ground
  • Police must intervene at 50PLUS party conference

Top stories

  • Seventh anniversary of the abduction of Amsterdam girl Insiya Hemani
  • Amsterdam-Oost added to legal cannabis cultivation trial
  • Demonstration in front of Radboud University Medical Center for better transgender care
  • Rotterdam shooting suspect remains in jail
  • Erasmus MC lecturer killed in Rotterdam shootings described as amiable, involved GP
  • Erasmus hospital was warned about student Fouad L., suspected of killing 3 in Rotterdam

© 2012-2023, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content