Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
WhatsApp_logo1.svg
WhatsApp logo (Picture: Wikimedia Commons/Юкатан, WhatsApp Media) - Credit: WhatsApp logo (Picture: Wikimedia Commons/Юкатан, WhatsApp Media)
Politics
Innovation
confidentiality
telecommunications
confidentiality law
WhatsApp
messages
emails
letters
telegraph messages
phone calls
d66
Kees Verhoeven
Ronald Plasterk
Ministry of Home Affairs
breaching confidentiallity
Nevin Ozutuk
Groenlinks
Ronald van Raak
SP
VVD
Sven Koopmans
Thursday, April 13, 2017 - 14:45
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

MPs want confidentiality over their WhatsApps, emails

A majority of the Tweede Kamer, the lower house of Dutch parliament, is in favor of a legislative amendment that would extend confidentiality to also apply to parliamentarians' digital communications, such as WhatsApp messages and emails. The government submitted the proposed amendment in 2014, and the Tweede Kamer debated it on Wednesday, NU.nl reports.

In te current law of confidentiality specifically refers to telephone conversations, telegraph messages and letters. If the change is implemented, it will refer to telecommunications. The idea is that referring to simply "telecommunications" would make the law future proof. 

The majority of the Kamer agrees that the law needs to be updated. "The current law is hopelessly outdated, we all agree with that", Sven Koopmans of the VVD said. He thinks the best way to get this amendment passed is to keep it "sober and neutral" and not to add anything to it.

This did not stop D66 parliamentarian Kees Verhoeven from calling for an amendment to the proposal. He wants the legislative amendment to state that confidentiality can only be breached if it is "necessary to protect national security". It currently says that confidentiality can only be breached "in the interest of national security". He believes that the distinction between the words "interest" and "necessary" will make sure that confidentiality is not breached as long as other methods of investigation are possible. 

Minister Ronald Plasterk of Home Affairs did not seem very enthusiastic with this change - he discouraged Verhoeven's motion, NU.nl reports.

GroenLinks parliamentarian Nevin Ozutuk wants the amendment to still mention letters separately, so that a court still has to give consent for breaching confidentiality for physical post. With the amendment as it now stands, the court does not have to give permission for breaching confidentiality for each specific form of communication, just communication as a whole. 

SP MP Ronald van Raak wants the amendment to state that the court has to give permission for each form of communication that will be breached.

When exactly parliament will vote on this amendment is unclear. According to NU.nl, the Kamer will probably wait for a new government to be formed before voting on this.

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Google, Twitter not liable for fake cryptocurrency ads featuring Dutch celebs: court
  • Legality concerns over €15.5 billion in gov't spending last year; Third year of shortcomings
  • Coronavirus-related enforcement cost police €44 million in overtime
  • KLM staff getting 5% wage increases delayed during Covid
  • More NL residents traveling as Covid restrictions disappear globally: ING
  • Senate rejecting temporary Covid law "a real inconvenience": Health Min.

Top stories

  • Dutch PM has been deleting text messages daily for years: report
  • F-16s intercept cargo plane in Dutch airspace after bomb threat
  • Less "classic crime" but more emergencies last year
  • Netherlands offers military protection to Finland, Sweden ahead of NATO decision
  • 40% want unhealthy people to pay more for health insurance
  • Dutch labor market super tight: 133 vacancies per 100 unemployed

© 2012-2022, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content