Skip to main content
Netherlands News in English

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
748px-Amsterdam_Wibautstraat_De_Volkskrant_001
Volkskrant building in Amsterdam, 2009 (Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Janericloebe) - Credit: Volkskrant building in Amsterdam, 2009 (Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Janericloebe)
compensation
damages
freedom of expression
Mohammed Rashid
Philippe Remarque
right to privacy
Volkskrant
Thursday, 15 September 2016 - 09:17

Share this article:

Dutch newspaper to appeal compensation for using man's photo without permission

A Dutch court ordered newspaper De Volkskrant to pay Mohammed Rashid 1,500 euros in compensation. Rashid filed a lawsuit against the Volkskrant after his photo appeared on the newspaper's front page without his permission. The Volkskrant is appealing against the ruling, NU.nl reports. Rashid's photo appeared on the Volkskrant front page on August 16th. The photo clearly showed his face as his car was checked by an officer of the Koninklijke Marechaussee, a police force that works as a branch of the Dutch military and is responsible for airport safety. The heading above the photo read (translated from Dutch) "Is Schiphol still safe?" The Muslim man felt that the newspaper deliberately put a Muslim man on the front page because the article was about Islamic terrorism. He demanded rectification and damages of 15 thousand euros. The court ruled that the Volkskrant infringed on Rashid's right to privacy and ordered the newspaper to pay 1,500 euros in compensation. Rectification is unnecessary, the judge decided. The newspaper disagrees with the ruling and will appeal, editor Philippe Remarque said on television show Pauw on Wednesday. "We want a second opinion from another judge because our freedom of expression is more important", he said. Shortly after the photo appeared, Remarque stated that the newspaper was trying to convey the reality - that only drivers with a "Muslim like appearance" were stopped. The editor is sticking to that. "We are shocked by this ruling", he said on Wednesday. "If personal injry is considered proven so easily on the basis of possible associations at home and abroad, the work of editors, photographers and cameramen is a lot tougher. We believe that freedom of information is at stake."

More like this

Image
Court gavel with a statue of Lady Justice in the background
Dutch gov't advanced over €168 million in damages to crime victims in 8 years
Image
Flowers and candles at a memorial
Violent crime victims’ relatives often drown in funeral, legal costs
Image
Suitcase at an airport
EU leaders agree to ban airlines from charging passengers for hand luggage
Image
A woman cries while speaking on the phone.
Dutch banks don't have to compensate customers who fall for helpdesk scams
Make NL Times your top Google source

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Weeronline warns of heat stress as tropical weather arrives on Thursday
  • Funding for Amsterdam's public transport expansion plans uncertain
  • Aggressive incidents rampant in top amateur football, affecting 80% of clubs
  • Young private sector tenants spend the largest portion of their income on housing
  • Sneek marathon canceled after organizers hired fake first-aid provider

Top stories

  • Video: Boy riding fatbike shot in front of Gouda grocery store
  • Boy, 2, dies after fall from window of Rotterdam home
  • Amsterdam to tackle discrimination, violent incidents with priority during World Pride
  • Researchers say Tesla overstated self-driving safety claim in Dutch approval process
  • Two men suspected in Amsterdam explosion remain jailed; Third person released

© 2012-2026, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Change Privacy Settings
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Partner Content