Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
No image available
No image available. The image may have been removed from it's original location - License: All Rights Reserved
asylum debate
asylum debates
Aucke van der Werff
court
Dutch Association of Journalists
emergency decree
freedom of the press
Heesch
Luttelgeest
NVJ
refugee crisis
Friday, 29 January 2016 - 15:40
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

Journalists barred from asylum debate cry foul

The Dutch association of journalists NVJ and Omroep Flevoland is considering going to court because of emergency decree at public meetings, such as debates about asylum centers. An emergency ordinance means that the press can be denied access to the meeting, and the NVJ wants the court to stop this, BNR reports. According to the NVJ, an emergency decree is a "disproportionate" measure that is "alarming and unworthy of a democracy", a spokesperson said to the broadcaster. The association describes situations like in Heesch as "yet another case where the press is denied access and can't do it's monitoring and reporting job." On Thursday night an emergency decree was implemented at an information meeting in Luttelgeest about a possible second asylum center in the town. Only people who were invited were allowed in, everyone else, including journalists from Omroep Flevoland, could not get closer than a five kilometer radius around the area. Mayor Aucke van der Werff told the broadcaster that the journalists were kept out so that the Luttelgeest residents could express themselves freely about the possible arrival of another asylum center. "I asked the police to keep the broadcaster out, to be able to talk in peace with only the local residents after which we as municipality can make our decision", she said. According to the mayor, the local residents have the right to express themselves out of sight of the cameras. If the broadcasters were there, they might have been hesitant to speak because "they run the risk of being on the front page of a newspaper or prominently displayed on a local station the next day." Omroep Flevoland calls this a gross violation of press freedom and is therefore turning to the court. "We are hindered in the exercise of our profession, which is to follow what is happening in society and report on it", Allard Berends, chief editor at Omroep Flevoland said to BNR.

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Children subjected to sexual abuse at SOS Kinderdorpen Suriname for years
  • Ministry working on new law to restrict non-compete clause
  • 500 email addresses of ABP pensioners accidentally leaked
  • Peru moves Joran van der Sloot for extradition to the US, disappearance of Natalee Holloway
  • Man injured after stabbing incident in Rotterdam, second suspect still on the run
  • Deceased can appear at funeral as digital clone thanks to AI, funeral industry requires rules

Top stories

  • Peru moves Joran van der Sloot for extradition to the US, disappearance of Natalee Holloway
  • National Witch Monuments planned in almost 20 cities in the Netherlands
  • Bakers in the Netherlands threaten to strike due to low wage offer
  • No Amsterdam-London trains for months next year due to maintenance work
  • Renewable energy rose slightly to 15% in the Netherlands in 2022; Halfway towards target
  • Jumbo stopping Max Verstappen sponsorship after this Formula 1 season

© 2012-2023, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content