Skip to main content
Netherlands News in English

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
Ministry of Finance in The Hague
Ministry of Finance in The Hague - Credit: FaceMePLS / DepositPhotos - License: CC-BY
Politics
Business
Dutch Supreme Court
Dutch Ministry of Finance
Tjebbe van Oostenbruggen
higher interest
corporate tax
Friday, 16 January 2026 - 14:30

Share this article:

Supreme Court rules against Ministry of Finance’s 2022 corporate tax interest hike

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Ministry of Finance was not allowed to increase the interest on business tax debts from 4 to 8 percent in 2022. The decision is expected to be costly for the treasury, as numerous companies have challenged the higher rate over the past few years.

According to the ministry, the total number of objections has risen to 29,500. Finance had earlier calculated that a favorable ruling for the objectors would cost the treasury at least 1.3 billion euros, but the figure is expected to be higher because of the extra appeals. “We will examine the ruling and assess its full impact,” a spokesperson said.

The case revolves around the interest companies owe when they pay corporate tax late, such as when tax returns are submitted after the deadline. In 2022, that interest rate was raised to 8 percent, even though rates for other taxes remained unchanged.

The Supreme Court ruled that the disparity violates the principle of equality. The court noted that the additional burden unfairly targeted a specific group of taxpayers without justification. For this reason, the interest increase was also deemed disproportionate.

Last year, former State Secretary for Fiscal Affairs Tjebbe van Oostenbruggen grouped all complaints about the tax interest under a so-called mass objection, with a final decision pending the Supreme Court’s ruling. The court now says that lowering the corporate tax interest back to 4 percent restores fairness, “without imposing an unjustified, selective increase in the burden.”

Reporting by ANP

More like this

Image
Vattenfall Headquarters in Solna, Sweden
Supreme Court advised to order retrial in Vattenfall unfair energy pricing case
Image
 A close-up view of an asbestos fiber held with tweezers.
Company accused in asbestos deaths argues case should be dismissed as too old
Image
Supreme Court of the Netherlands in The Hague.
Dutch Supreme Court often gives no reasons for rejected appeals, data show
Image
Ben Smith.
Dutch government to challenge multimillion-euro executive pay at KLM and Air France-KLM
Make NL Times your top Google source

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Wasteful Oranje punished as Algeria snatch late victory in World Cup warm-up
  • Dutch State buys medieval ring found with metal detector for €83,150
  • Rotterdam shooting suspect arrested in Spain within days of fleeing
  • Nearly 90% of Dutch dermatologists link TikTok skincare trends to patient skin problems
  • Dogs falling ill, dying after swimming in the IJmeer near Amsterdam & Almere

Top stories

  • Court rules Ye can remain in Netherlands for Arnhem performances this week
  • New A'dam coalition planning parking +tourist tax hike, free public transport for kids
  • European Commission tells Netherlands to stop extra border controls
  • Pregnant woman thrown to ground at Zeist asylum shelter was trying to ask cop a question
  • Senior Dutch virologist, colleague accused of smuggling inactive Mpox into United States

© 2012-2026, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Change Privacy Settings
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Partner Content