Skip to main content
Netherlands News in English

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
Extinction Rebellion protesting against ING’s fossil fuel investments at a bank branch in Gouda. 9 July 2022
Extinction Rebellion protesting against ING’s fossil fuel investments at a bank branch in Gouda. 9 July 2022 - Credit: Extinction Rebellion NL / Supplied to NL Times - License: All Rights Reserved
Crime
Nature
climate activists
Dutch Supreme Court
wrongful conviction
European Court of Human Rights
Tweede Kamer
Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate
ING
Tuesday, 30 September 2025 - 20:20

Share this article:

Opens in a new window Opens in a new window Opens in a new window Opens in a new window Opens in a new window Opens in a new window

Dutch Supreme Court overturns convictions of eight climate activists

The Dutch Supreme Court has annulled the convictions of eight climate activists and sent their cases back to the Court of Appeal in The Hague. The activists had previously been found guilty of local disturbance and disrupting a parliamentary session, but no sentences were imposed, as the court determined that law enforcement had overstepped in limiting their right to demonstrate.

The cases involved a protest in the Tweede Kamer, the lower house of Dutch parliament, in 2019, a demonstration in the lobby of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy in 2020, and actions in ING offices in 2022. In all cases, it was established that the demonstrations were peaceful and limited in nature, with no damage or disruption caused.

The Supreme Court ruled that it was wrong for the activists to be convicted, even though no punishment was imposed. In its reasoning, the court cited decisions by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), stating that when a court finds that criminal enforcement “has gone too far as a whole,” a guilty verdict should be avoided.

Prosecution should then be dismissed entirely. In other words, the facts may be established, but under the circumstances, they do not constitute a criminal offense.

The activists were all detained, held for several hours at the police station, and subsequently prosecuted by the Public Prosecution Service (OM). The court of appeal ruled that this response was excessive and that any limitations on the right to demonstrate should be “kept to an absolute minimum.”

Reporting by ANP

More like this

Image
Artificial Intelligence
Cabinet seeks to build national AI center without budget in place
Image
Asylum Minister Marjolein Faber contradicts herself about the readiness of her legal argument to declare an asylum emergency. 15 October 2024
Asylum Minister accused of ignorance, wishful thinking as she brushes MP concerns aside
Image
ING Bank
Court orders ING to disclose details of deal with Google Pay
Image
Artificial Intelligence
Dutch government designing own sovereign data cloud
Make NL Times your top Google source

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Dutch Research Council awards grants up to €320,000 to 205 early-career scientists
  • Dutch gambling authority reprimands Vbet for illegal World Cup bets
  • North Sea hits record 20.4°C amid marine heat wave
  • ‘Customer-unfriendly’: Dutch hospitality visitors irritated by on-screen tip requests
  • Court orders ING to disclose details of deal with Google Pay

Top stories

  • Vitesse can keep its professional football license; Supreme Court rules against KNVB
  • Dutch municipalities still leaking citizen data 9 years after order to tighten security
  • Trade union annoucnes 24-hour train strike, other labor actions in September
  • Sharp rise in reports about people with disturbed behavior
  • Water shortage declared in the Netherlands; Gov't considering measures

© 2012-2026, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Change Privacy Settings
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Partner Content