Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
800px-Handcuffed_man_(2)
File photo showing a police arrest - Credit: Picture: Wikimedia Commons/Lionel Allorge
Crime
confession
evidence expert
forced confession
Heidy Goedhart
Kaatsheuvel
manipulated confession
murder
Peter van Koppen
Ton Derksen
trial
undercover operation
Wim S.
Wednesday, 15 July 2015 - 08:39
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

Police accused of manipulating murder confession

The case surrounding the murder of Heidy Goedhart from Kaatsheuvel seemed to be neatly wrapped up when her partner, Wim S., confessed to killing her last year. But experts are now calling the confession unreliable and worthless, because of the way that the police manipulated the suspect into giving it, Brabants Dagblad reports based on the police file on the case. Heidy Goedhart was found dead in her home in 2010. She had been strangled. Her partner, Wim S., was arrested and in custody for three months, but eventually released due to lack of evidence. In 2013 the police launched a major undercover operation in an effort to get S. to confess. For one year 16 officers pulled out all the stops to get a confession. It started with one officer crashing crashing into S.' car, in order to make contact with him. S., who had money problems, was befriended and drawn in with a job offer for a security company. The police did not hold back. Actions to win S.' trust included meetings in the upmarket Spanish resort Marbella, IT contracts worth thousands of euros and even a ride on a Harley Davidson. A total of 34 thousand euros was spent on him. The officers finally managed to get a confession in 2014 in Marbella. S. was offered work, on the condition that he confessed to the murder. At first S. denied the claim. But after learning that this would cost him the job, he confessed to strangling Goedhart. He later retracted the statement. Evidence experts are now criticizing the undercover operation. "There is no sign of technical evidence here", said evidence expert Peter van Koppen, according to the AD. "All the wrong interrogation tricks were used." Ton Derksen, who wrote several books on legal errors, also doesn't have a good word to say. "This confession is not reliable." The trial for this case starts on Thursday.

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Amsterdam alderman wants to introduce 20km/h biking speed limit
  • University of Groningen students stage sit-in demanding return of fired professor
  • Asylum agency still facing high absenteeism as more violence occurs in asylum centers
  • Man arrested for fatal accident that killed entire Raamdonksveer family
  • More people ditch TV for streamers; Dutch MPs want more investment in Dutch productions
  • Dutch authorities preparing for outbreak of candida auris, a fungus that can be lethal

Top stories

  • Dutch authorities preparing for outbreak of candida auris, a fungus that can be lethal
  • Badger train stoppage will continue for weeks; Badgers digging in 40 locations
  • European Commission pushed Netherlands to expropriate farmers in nitrogen crisis: report
  • Concerns about Ukrainian refugees being exploited in Netherlands
  • Home prices down 0.8% in Feb.; First year-on-year decrease in nearly a decade
  • Hospital workers to go back on strike in mid-April, unions say

© 2012-2023, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content