Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Politics
court
Elianne van Rens
fewer Moroccans
fewer Moroccans trial
Geert Wilders
hate speech trial
lawyer Geert-Jan Knoops
pre-trial hearing
PVV
Wilders hate speech trial
Thursday, 7 April 2016 - 13:25
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

Court rejects all Wilders' demands in hate speech trial

The court in Amsterdam rejected all three of PVV leader Geert Wilders' requests during the second, very short, pre-trial hearing in the hate speech trial against him. Wilders' lawyer demanded that the trial be suspended while a document leak is investigated, that one of the judges step down and that a number of expert witnesses be questioned. Lawyer Geert-Jan Knoops demanded that the trial be postponed so that the court can investigate the leak of a legal brief the lawyer drafted. The legal brief landed in the hands of newspaper AD just before the first pre-trial hearing in this case a few weeks ago. "We now can't prepare our defense well with a leak. We can not perform our work freely anymore", the lawyer said, according to RTL Nieuws. But the court denied the request. According to the judges, the leak is the defense's problem, and not the court's. "It is up to the defense themselves to investigate the leak or report it to the police", the court said. "It is not the role of the court." The lawyer also wanted one of the judges, Elianne van Rens, to withdraw from the case. According to Wilders, she previously expressed criticism on him and the PVV and is therefore biased. This too the court rejected. According to Van Res, even judges may have criticism. In a short statement she promised Wilders that she will be unbiased in her judgement on this case. Finally the court also rejected Wilders' demands for expert witnesses because they "are not necessary for the assessment of the criminal case". Wilders was not at the hearing as he is partaking in the parliamentary debate with Minister Ard van der Steur of Security and Justice in the Tweede Kamer, which started 15 minutes after the hearing did. Despite this, he had time to respond to the court's decisions on Twitter: "PVV-haters in this fake court already have a judgement. No fair trial." The PVV leader is facing charges of deliberately insulting a group of people because of their race and inciting hatred or discrimination against these people. This is because of statements he made dring an election campaign in The Hague in 2014 – he asked a cafe full of his supporters whether they want more or fewer Moroccans in the city, to which they chanted “fewer, fewer, fewer”.

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • More Dutch providers offering hourly energy rates so consumers can aim for lowest prices
  • Young employees at self-scan tills feel unsafe because of aggressive customers
  • State of nature and wildlife continues to decline in the Netherlands, says WWF
  • "Major concerns" in Parliament about Cabinet's housing construction plans, missed targets
  • Sex workers clash with Amsterdam mayor after protest against Red Light District policy
  • Animal shelters overflowing with exotics bought online during panemic

Top stories

  • Sex workers clash with Amsterdam mayor after protest against Red Light District policy
  • Seven civilians killed in Dutch airstrike on Mosul in 2016: Report
  • Jumbo to stop sponsoring cycling, skating teams end next year
  • Amsterdam Noord also clashes with mayor over erotic center plans
  • Gender roles still massively influence career advice for secondary school students
  • Police officer won't be charged for triple fatal crash during chase

© 2012-2023, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content