Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Top stories
  • Health
  • Crime
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Tech
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Weird
  • 1-1-2
Image
Plasterk_Dutch_politician_kabinet_Balkenende_IV
- Credit: Minister Ronald Plasterk - Kingdom Relations (Source: Wikimedia Commons/Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst)
AIVD
confidentiality
court
CTIVD
dutch government
eavesdropping
EU
European Convention on Human Rights
European Union
General Intelligence and Security Service
lawsuit
Ministry of Home Affairs
Prakken d'Oliveira
Ronald Plasterk
wire tap
Wednesday, 22 April 2015 - 10:00
Share this:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • reddit

Spying on defense attorneys sparks lawsuit against Dutch gov't

Lawyer firm Prakken d'Oliveira has filed a lawsuit against the Dutch government for the AIVD eavesdropping on lawyers' conversations with clients, Volkskrant reports. Last year the lawyer firm filed a complaint with Minister Ronald Plasterk of Home Affairs, believing that the General Information and Security Service (AIVD) was eavesdropping on their telephone conversations with clients. According to the firm, their suspicions were confirmed by Plasterk's reply. Among others, the firm defends a number of suspected jihadists, including Oussama C. who is suspected of recruiting for the jihad. An investigation by supervisory committee CTIVD found that Prakken d'Oliveira's phones had been tapped since 2003. The CTIVD concluded that the secret service acted "improperly" in some cases. In December Plasterk sent a message to the lawyer firm regarding the investigation. He refused to disclose the CTIVD's report as it could give insight into the workings of the AIVD. The letter did not state that the AIVD stopped eavesdropping on the lawyers. "It is sad that Plaster could not come to the conclusion that this can not be allowed himself." Michiel Pestman, one of the lawyers, said to the newspaper. "Therefore we have no choice but to ask the court to immediately stop the eavesdropping on us. It is in the interest of the law that we are able to speak with our clients in confidence." The lawyers consider the wire tapping to be in conflict with the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Union's law. According to the Volkskrant, the lawyers are opposed to the fact that the considerations within the AIVD are secret and they only need to get permission from the minister responsible for the AIVD before tapping a lawyer's line. They want a independent judge to test whether it is necessary before a lawyer's phone is tapped. They also point to the system of number recognition that the police already use. This system automatically stops tapping if a client is calling a lawyer.

Follow us:

Latest stories

  • Man robbed at gunpoint in latest dating app violent incident
  • Dutch gov’t commits €26 mil. to fight retail vacancy as 80% make online purchases
  • Plan to turn former Arnhem dome prison into a hotel and apartments
  • Reckless driver faces up to 7 years in jail for killing entire family in car crash
  • 6 people arrested in Netherlands and Belgium on suspicion of illegal trade with Russia
  • Badgers again disrupting train traffic; Fewer trains between Tilburg Univ. and Eindhoven

Top stories

  • Police catch second man during investigation into three fatal Rotterdam shootings
  • First responders got stuck in traffic on the way A1 accident in which two girls died
  • At least 1,000 votes from Dutch abroad arrived too late
  • Nine people with Dutch ties leave Gaza Strip
  • Journalist snaps pic of Omtzigt's Cabinet formation note: Low interest in PVV, BBB, NSC deal
  • Boris Johnson allegedly planned military raid on Dutch Covid-19 vaccine factory

© 2012-2023, NL Times, All rights reserved.

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • Partner content